2023-24 Programmatic Review

Cabarrus County Schools prides itself on meeting the needs of our students and community by offering a variety of pathways and program options that promote choice and equip students to compete for evolving career opportunities in the 21st century.

These unique school options should evolve over time and align with strategies that address current student needs for growth and enrichment while continuing to ignite their individual passion and zest for learning in accordance with Cabarrus County’s Destination 2025 and Strategic Plan.

Our goal is to prepare all learners for 21st Century careers, and for all students to encompass every characteristic of the NC Dept. of Public Instruction recently released “NC Portrait of a Graduate” found here.

Questions

Questions

Leave your questions here:

You need to be signed in to add your question.

Share When I attended a CCS elementary school in the 1990's, I clearly remember attending and learning basic Spanish as a weekly or so encore class. It's really the only Spanish I still remember! In middle school in CCS, I wanted to take French instead, so I did as a rotational elective course. I continued with French in high school and college. There were options for second language access at every level in CCS at that time. Question 1: Why isn't a language elective offered at EVERY CCS elementary school? I love my child's school, but I don't understand why the only way to have a public school teacher teach a second language is to move them to a program of choice in a dual immersion, which apparently are also being axed. Question 2: What actions are being taken to expose every elementary school student to a second language? Question 3: And if no actions are being taken to do this, why not? on Facebook Share When I attended a CCS elementary school in the 1990's, I clearly remember attending and learning basic Spanish as a weekly or so encore class. It's really the only Spanish I still remember! In middle school in CCS, I wanted to take French instead, so I did as a rotational elective course. I continued with French in high school and college. There were options for second language access at every level in CCS at that time. Question 1: Why isn't a language elective offered at EVERY CCS elementary school? I love my child's school, but I don't understand why the only way to have a public school teacher teach a second language is to move them to a program of choice in a dual immersion, which apparently are also being axed. Question 2: What actions are being taken to expose every elementary school student to a second language? Question 3: And if no actions are being taken to do this, why not? on Twitter Share When I attended a CCS elementary school in the 1990's, I clearly remember attending and learning basic Spanish as a weekly or so encore class. It's really the only Spanish I still remember! In middle school in CCS, I wanted to take French instead, so I did as a rotational elective course. I continued with French in high school and college. There were options for second language access at every level in CCS at that time. Question 1: Why isn't a language elective offered at EVERY CCS elementary school? I love my child's school, but I don't understand why the only way to have a public school teacher teach a second language is to move them to a program of choice in a dual immersion, which apparently are also being axed. Question 2: What actions are being taken to expose every elementary school student to a second language? Question 3: And if no actions are being taken to do this, why not? on Linkedin Email When I attended a CCS elementary school in the 1990's, I clearly remember attending and learning basic Spanish as a weekly or so encore class. It's really the only Spanish I still remember! In middle school in CCS, I wanted to take French instead, so I did as a rotational elective course. I continued with French in high school and college. There were options for second language access at every level in CCS at that time. Question 1: Why isn't a language elective offered at EVERY CCS elementary school? I love my child's school, but I don't understand why the only way to have a public school teacher teach a second language is to move them to a program of choice in a dual immersion, which apparently are also being axed. Question 2: What actions are being taken to expose every elementary school student to a second language? Question 3: And if no actions are being taken to do this, why not? link

When I attended a CCS elementary school in the 1990's, I clearly remember attending and learning basic Spanish as a weekly or so encore class. It's really the only Spanish I still remember! In middle school in CCS, I wanted to take French instead, so I did as a rotational elective course. I continued with French in high school and college. There were options for second language access at every level in CCS at that time. Question 1: Why isn't a language elective offered at EVERY CCS elementary school? I love my child's school, but I don't understand why the only way to have a public school teacher teach a second language is to move them to a program of choice in a dual immersion, which apparently are also being axed. Question 2: What actions are being taken to expose every elementary school student to a second language? Question 3: And if no actions are being taken to do this, why not?

CABARRUSCOUNTYPARENT asked 6 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your input. Schools have different needs and staff their teachers accordingly. Unfortunately, the state does not provide any funding to allot for world language teachers at the elementary level. World Languages are considered an optional elective at the elementary level. Cabarrus County Schools continues to advocate for additional extracurricular opportunities for all students. Each of our schools intentionally designs schedules based on the individual needs of our school community. As a district we look for a variety of enrichment opportunities outside of the traditional encore courses including but not limited to Arts Council Performances, text sets, and guest speakers for culturally relevant events throughout the course of the year.
Share Can parents get a copy of the presentation that was shown on 9.21 detailing the reasons to end the balanced calendar? on Facebook Share Can parents get a copy of the presentation that was shown on 9.21 detailing the reasons to end the balanced calendar? on Twitter Share Can parents get a copy of the presentation that was shown on 9.21 detailing the reasons to end the balanced calendar? on Linkedin Email Can parents get a copy of the presentation that was shown on 9.21 detailing the reasons to end the balanced calendar? link

Can parents get a copy of the presentation that was shown on 9.21 detailing the reasons to end the balanced calendar?

Shana Filkins asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your participation and value your input. The parent presentation at Wolf Meadow Elementary has been added to the public available on this page in the documents tab.
Share As a WMES parent and stakeholder, I would like some clarification regarding the recommendation that the committee landed on regarding the WMES Balanced Calendar. 1. Why was the only communication regarding the survey via ParentSquare? This is a new communication tool that many families and even teachers/staff are still trying to learn. We had 1 message sent out and then a reminder “pinned” to the initial message. The reminder was in response to a conversation during a PTO meeting where parents didn’t know about the survey and weren’t sure how to find it in ParentSquare. It seems that various communication platforms for this important of an initiative would have been used vs. just one brand-new platform which I imagine some families have not yet downloaded/registered or begun to use. For other initiatives, we get phone calls, emails from teachers, social media highlights, flyers sent home, etc. I'd also suggest that an in-person option for this type of desired feedback would have been a welcomed opportunity and would have allowed for actual dialogue with the stakeholders (teachers/staff/families) vs. just an electronic survey. 2. Of the families and staff that completed the survey, the majority of the response was in favor of the balanced calendar. What weight does that have within your final recommendation? 3. Are the results/recommendation and opportunities for feedback going to be communicated in addition to the Teams call so that everyone has access to the information? From what I've seen, no follow-up has been sent out other than the invite/reminder for the one TEAMS call last Thursday (Sept. 21) at 4pm, which was sent via Parent Square - the problem with that platform already acknowledged. From what I could tell, there were 14 people (including leadership and families) on the call. I truly wonder how many parents/families even know this review process is taking place - especially with it only being communicated via ParentSquare! Also, we are being directed to this page (Engage CCS) for communication. However, the WMES review project was not listed on the site at the time of the call and wasn't listed until the following day after the Teams call and the QA component was not available until several days later. Based on the communication that has occurred, unless someone was on the call, they would not know about this page or option for information/feedback. Considering these observations along with how the whole thing has been played out, it does make the process of coming to a recommendation seem somewhat questionable. 4. Was the fact that the timeline for the survey results/recommendation communication falls right within a WMES intercession making it difficult for parents/families and teachers/staff to process and communicate together considered? I can imagine there is no perfect time to roll something like this out, but to be made aware of it on the first day of an intercession did prove to be frustrating. 5. According to the EOG data shared during the online update meeting, the data indicates that there has been some growth and some decline in the various areas tested. 2023 seemingly has the most decline overall. Was there any consideration of the “why” behind those scores? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have EC fully staffed? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have all grade-level classrooms fully staffed with some of them going weeks/months with a substitute? Was it acknowledged we had a brand new principal? Was it acknowledged that during Quarters 3&4 of the 2021-2022 school year, we lost many teachers and leadership (MTSS, Principal, etc.) with several of those classroom teacher vacancies and the MTSS role not being able to be immediately replaced? 6. What is the comparison of WMES EOG and absence/attendance data vs. the rest of the county with similar demographics? Can it be proven that going to the traditional calendar will ensure growth? From what I've been able to find online, it seems that there are other schools that are on the traditional calendar that are lower than WMES. What is the committee's and/or county's overall goal in placing WMES back on a traditional calendar? Is this recommended change back to traditional simply to make it “easier” for the county overall? With the survey results, big-picture data, and lack of communication and opportunity for dialogue, it seems this recommendation is potentially based on the committee’/county leadership's preference vs. what data and feedback suggest is profitable and desirable for the students/families. 7. Was the growth trend from the years of beginning the balanced calendar up until the pandemic considered? Based on the NC DPI’s grading system, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. This was a trend that as a parent I was excited to see when researching WMES in consideration of enrolling my child there. 8. Was there any conversation that 2023 has proven to be off to a great start with student growth (academic and behavior) already being seen and seemingly improved teacher morale already being shown? My child is one who is currently experiencing some growth academically and I do attribute that to not having a long summer break and getting them back into a classroom environment after a short break and not having a lot of learning loss. 9. Was it considered that many teachers/staff members and families within the community chose WMES BECAUSE of the balanced calendar? 10. Were our demographics given any consideration? With the number of at-risk students represented, their being out of the classroom for 3/5 weeks at a time seems like a much better option for addressing structure insecurity (food, safety, etc.) than for a full summer. Thank you for your consideration of these questions and feedback. WMES has faced and overcome some huge hurdles over the past few years and I am thankful for and proud of how our administration, staff, and teachers have stayed focused and committed to serving the students and families to the best of their ability. It is sometimes frustrating that we allow the test data to paint the picture vs. the stories of success happening within our schools every day that cannot always be reflected on a standardized test. I am proud to be a part of WMES and know that there are so many great things ahead for the school as a whole! The balanced calendar is an asset and truly works for many families. We are one that chose WMES based on both the balanced calendar and dual language option with the balanced calendar being the biggest draw. From my experience, many times when the balanced calendar story is told within the community, it is told with pride and celebrated by others! I do understand that there are families zoned for WMES that choose to not attend there and apply to attend another school. I see our families within the county having options for what best fits their family as a beautiful thing and something to be celebrated. I believe that our having a variety of choice schools truly helps to make CCS shine! Based on how this has all played out, survey feedback, appreciation for choice schools, etc. I do ask that you reconsider your recommendation as I believe that it would truly be a great loss for us as a school and as a county to take a step backward in many ways by eliminating the balanced calendar option! on Facebook Share As a WMES parent and stakeholder, I would like some clarification regarding the recommendation that the committee landed on regarding the WMES Balanced Calendar. 1. Why was the only communication regarding the survey via ParentSquare? This is a new communication tool that many families and even teachers/staff are still trying to learn. We had 1 message sent out and then a reminder “pinned” to the initial message. The reminder was in response to a conversation during a PTO meeting where parents didn’t know about the survey and weren’t sure how to find it in ParentSquare. It seems that various communication platforms for this important of an initiative would have been used vs. just one brand-new platform which I imagine some families have not yet downloaded/registered or begun to use. For other initiatives, we get phone calls, emails from teachers, social media highlights, flyers sent home, etc. I'd also suggest that an in-person option for this type of desired feedback would have been a welcomed opportunity and would have allowed for actual dialogue with the stakeholders (teachers/staff/families) vs. just an electronic survey. 2. Of the families and staff that completed the survey, the majority of the response was in favor of the balanced calendar. What weight does that have within your final recommendation? 3. Are the results/recommendation and opportunities for feedback going to be communicated in addition to the Teams call so that everyone has access to the information? From what I've seen, no follow-up has been sent out other than the invite/reminder for the one TEAMS call last Thursday (Sept. 21) at 4pm, which was sent via Parent Square - the problem with that platform already acknowledged. From what I could tell, there were 14 people (including leadership and families) on the call. I truly wonder how many parents/families even know this review process is taking place - especially with it only being communicated via ParentSquare! Also, we are being directed to this page (Engage CCS) for communication. However, the WMES review project was not listed on the site at the time of the call and wasn't listed until the following day after the Teams call and the QA component was not available until several days later. Based on the communication that has occurred, unless someone was on the call, they would not know about this page or option for information/feedback. Considering these observations along with how the whole thing has been played out, it does make the process of coming to a recommendation seem somewhat questionable. 4. Was the fact that the timeline for the survey results/recommendation communication falls right within a WMES intercession making it difficult for parents/families and teachers/staff to process and communicate together considered? I can imagine there is no perfect time to roll something like this out, but to be made aware of it on the first day of an intercession did prove to be frustrating. 5. According to the EOG data shared during the online update meeting, the data indicates that there has been some growth and some decline in the various areas tested. 2023 seemingly has the most decline overall. Was there any consideration of the “why” behind those scores? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have EC fully staffed? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have all grade-level classrooms fully staffed with some of them going weeks/months with a substitute? Was it acknowledged we had a brand new principal? Was it acknowledged that during Quarters 3&4 of the 2021-2022 school year, we lost many teachers and leadership (MTSS, Principal, etc.) with several of those classroom teacher vacancies and the MTSS role not being able to be immediately replaced? 6. What is the comparison of WMES EOG and absence/attendance data vs. the rest of the county with similar demographics? Can it be proven that going to the traditional calendar will ensure growth? From what I've been able to find online, it seems that there are other schools that are on the traditional calendar that are lower than WMES. What is the committee's and/or county's overall goal in placing WMES back on a traditional calendar? Is this recommended change back to traditional simply to make it “easier” for the county overall? With the survey results, big-picture data, and lack of communication and opportunity for dialogue, it seems this recommendation is potentially based on the committee’/county leadership's preference vs. what data and feedback suggest is profitable and desirable for the students/families. 7. Was the growth trend from the years of beginning the balanced calendar up until the pandemic considered? Based on the NC DPI’s grading system, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. This was a trend that as a parent I was excited to see when researching WMES in consideration of enrolling my child there. 8. Was there any conversation that 2023 has proven to be off to a great start with student growth (academic and behavior) already being seen and seemingly improved teacher morale already being shown? My child is one who is currently experiencing some growth academically and I do attribute that to not having a long summer break and getting them back into a classroom environment after a short break and not having a lot of learning loss. 9. Was it considered that many teachers/staff members and families within the community chose WMES BECAUSE of the balanced calendar? 10. Were our demographics given any consideration? With the number of at-risk students represented, their being out of the classroom for 3/5 weeks at a time seems like a much better option for addressing structure insecurity (food, safety, etc.) than for a full summer. Thank you for your consideration of these questions and feedback. WMES has faced and overcome some huge hurdles over the past few years and I am thankful for and proud of how our administration, staff, and teachers have stayed focused and committed to serving the students and families to the best of their ability. It is sometimes frustrating that we allow the test data to paint the picture vs. the stories of success happening within our schools every day that cannot always be reflected on a standardized test. I am proud to be a part of WMES and know that there are so many great things ahead for the school as a whole! The balanced calendar is an asset and truly works for many families. We are one that chose WMES based on both the balanced calendar and dual language option with the balanced calendar being the biggest draw. From my experience, many times when the balanced calendar story is told within the community, it is told with pride and celebrated by others! I do understand that there are families zoned for WMES that choose to not attend there and apply to attend another school. I see our families within the county having options for what best fits their family as a beautiful thing and something to be celebrated. I believe that our having a variety of choice schools truly helps to make CCS shine! Based on how this has all played out, survey feedback, appreciation for choice schools, etc. I do ask that you reconsider your recommendation as I believe that it would truly be a great loss for us as a school and as a county to take a step backward in many ways by eliminating the balanced calendar option! on Twitter Share As a WMES parent and stakeholder, I would like some clarification regarding the recommendation that the committee landed on regarding the WMES Balanced Calendar. 1. Why was the only communication regarding the survey via ParentSquare? This is a new communication tool that many families and even teachers/staff are still trying to learn. We had 1 message sent out and then a reminder “pinned” to the initial message. The reminder was in response to a conversation during a PTO meeting where parents didn’t know about the survey and weren’t sure how to find it in ParentSquare. It seems that various communication platforms for this important of an initiative would have been used vs. just one brand-new platform which I imagine some families have not yet downloaded/registered or begun to use. For other initiatives, we get phone calls, emails from teachers, social media highlights, flyers sent home, etc. I'd also suggest that an in-person option for this type of desired feedback would have been a welcomed opportunity and would have allowed for actual dialogue with the stakeholders (teachers/staff/families) vs. just an electronic survey. 2. Of the families and staff that completed the survey, the majority of the response was in favor of the balanced calendar. What weight does that have within your final recommendation? 3. Are the results/recommendation and opportunities for feedback going to be communicated in addition to the Teams call so that everyone has access to the information? From what I've seen, no follow-up has been sent out other than the invite/reminder for the one TEAMS call last Thursday (Sept. 21) at 4pm, which was sent via Parent Square - the problem with that platform already acknowledged. From what I could tell, there were 14 people (including leadership and families) on the call. I truly wonder how many parents/families even know this review process is taking place - especially with it only being communicated via ParentSquare! Also, we are being directed to this page (Engage CCS) for communication. However, the WMES review project was not listed on the site at the time of the call and wasn't listed until the following day after the Teams call and the QA component was not available until several days later. Based on the communication that has occurred, unless someone was on the call, they would not know about this page or option for information/feedback. Considering these observations along with how the whole thing has been played out, it does make the process of coming to a recommendation seem somewhat questionable. 4. Was the fact that the timeline for the survey results/recommendation communication falls right within a WMES intercession making it difficult for parents/families and teachers/staff to process and communicate together considered? I can imagine there is no perfect time to roll something like this out, but to be made aware of it on the first day of an intercession did prove to be frustrating. 5. According to the EOG data shared during the online update meeting, the data indicates that there has been some growth and some decline in the various areas tested. 2023 seemingly has the most decline overall. Was there any consideration of the “why” behind those scores? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have EC fully staffed? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have all grade-level classrooms fully staffed with some of them going weeks/months with a substitute? Was it acknowledged we had a brand new principal? Was it acknowledged that during Quarters 3&4 of the 2021-2022 school year, we lost many teachers and leadership (MTSS, Principal, etc.) with several of those classroom teacher vacancies and the MTSS role not being able to be immediately replaced? 6. What is the comparison of WMES EOG and absence/attendance data vs. the rest of the county with similar demographics? Can it be proven that going to the traditional calendar will ensure growth? From what I've been able to find online, it seems that there are other schools that are on the traditional calendar that are lower than WMES. What is the committee's and/or county's overall goal in placing WMES back on a traditional calendar? Is this recommended change back to traditional simply to make it “easier” for the county overall? With the survey results, big-picture data, and lack of communication and opportunity for dialogue, it seems this recommendation is potentially based on the committee’/county leadership's preference vs. what data and feedback suggest is profitable and desirable for the students/families. 7. Was the growth trend from the years of beginning the balanced calendar up until the pandemic considered? Based on the NC DPI’s grading system, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. This was a trend that as a parent I was excited to see when researching WMES in consideration of enrolling my child there. 8. Was there any conversation that 2023 has proven to be off to a great start with student growth (academic and behavior) already being seen and seemingly improved teacher morale already being shown? My child is one who is currently experiencing some growth academically and I do attribute that to not having a long summer break and getting them back into a classroom environment after a short break and not having a lot of learning loss. 9. Was it considered that many teachers/staff members and families within the community chose WMES BECAUSE of the balanced calendar? 10. Were our demographics given any consideration? With the number of at-risk students represented, their being out of the classroom for 3/5 weeks at a time seems like a much better option for addressing structure insecurity (food, safety, etc.) than for a full summer. Thank you for your consideration of these questions and feedback. WMES has faced and overcome some huge hurdles over the past few years and I am thankful for and proud of how our administration, staff, and teachers have stayed focused and committed to serving the students and families to the best of their ability. It is sometimes frustrating that we allow the test data to paint the picture vs. the stories of success happening within our schools every day that cannot always be reflected on a standardized test. I am proud to be a part of WMES and know that there are so many great things ahead for the school as a whole! The balanced calendar is an asset and truly works for many families. We are one that chose WMES based on both the balanced calendar and dual language option with the balanced calendar being the biggest draw. From my experience, many times when the balanced calendar story is told within the community, it is told with pride and celebrated by others! I do understand that there are families zoned for WMES that choose to not attend there and apply to attend another school. I see our families within the county having options for what best fits their family as a beautiful thing and something to be celebrated. I believe that our having a variety of choice schools truly helps to make CCS shine! Based on how this has all played out, survey feedback, appreciation for choice schools, etc. I do ask that you reconsider your recommendation as I believe that it would truly be a great loss for us as a school and as a county to take a step backward in many ways by eliminating the balanced calendar option! on Linkedin Email As a WMES parent and stakeholder, I would like some clarification regarding the recommendation that the committee landed on regarding the WMES Balanced Calendar. 1. Why was the only communication regarding the survey via ParentSquare? This is a new communication tool that many families and even teachers/staff are still trying to learn. We had 1 message sent out and then a reminder “pinned” to the initial message. The reminder was in response to a conversation during a PTO meeting where parents didn’t know about the survey and weren’t sure how to find it in ParentSquare. It seems that various communication platforms for this important of an initiative would have been used vs. just one brand-new platform which I imagine some families have not yet downloaded/registered or begun to use. For other initiatives, we get phone calls, emails from teachers, social media highlights, flyers sent home, etc. I'd also suggest that an in-person option for this type of desired feedback would have been a welcomed opportunity and would have allowed for actual dialogue with the stakeholders (teachers/staff/families) vs. just an electronic survey. 2. Of the families and staff that completed the survey, the majority of the response was in favor of the balanced calendar. What weight does that have within your final recommendation? 3. Are the results/recommendation and opportunities for feedback going to be communicated in addition to the Teams call so that everyone has access to the information? From what I've seen, no follow-up has been sent out other than the invite/reminder for the one TEAMS call last Thursday (Sept. 21) at 4pm, which was sent via Parent Square - the problem with that platform already acknowledged. From what I could tell, there were 14 people (including leadership and families) on the call. I truly wonder how many parents/families even know this review process is taking place - especially with it only being communicated via ParentSquare! Also, we are being directed to this page (Engage CCS) for communication. However, the WMES review project was not listed on the site at the time of the call and wasn't listed until the following day after the Teams call and the QA component was not available until several days later. Based on the communication that has occurred, unless someone was on the call, they would not know about this page or option for information/feedback. Considering these observations along with how the whole thing has been played out, it does make the process of coming to a recommendation seem somewhat questionable. 4. Was the fact that the timeline for the survey results/recommendation communication falls right within a WMES intercession making it difficult for parents/families and teachers/staff to process and communicate together considered? I can imagine there is no perfect time to roll something like this out, but to be made aware of it on the first day of an intercession did prove to be frustrating. 5. According to the EOG data shared during the online update meeting, the data indicates that there has been some growth and some decline in the various areas tested. 2023 seemingly has the most decline overall. Was there any consideration of the “why” behind those scores? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have EC fully staffed? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have all grade-level classrooms fully staffed with some of them going weeks/months with a substitute? Was it acknowledged we had a brand new principal? Was it acknowledged that during Quarters 3&4 of the 2021-2022 school year, we lost many teachers and leadership (MTSS, Principal, etc.) with several of those classroom teacher vacancies and the MTSS role not being able to be immediately replaced? 6. What is the comparison of WMES EOG and absence/attendance data vs. the rest of the county with similar demographics? Can it be proven that going to the traditional calendar will ensure growth? From what I've been able to find online, it seems that there are other schools that are on the traditional calendar that are lower than WMES. What is the committee's and/or county's overall goal in placing WMES back on a traditional calendar? Is this recommended change back to traditional simply to make it “easier” for the county overall? With the survey results, big-picture data, and lack of communication and opportunity for dialogue, it seems this recommendation is potentially based on the committee’/county leadership's preference vs. what data and feedback suggest is profitable and desirable for the students/families. 7. Was the growth trend from the years of beginning the balanced calendar up until the pandemic considered? Based on the NC DPI’s grading system, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. This was a trend that as a parent I was excited to see when researching WMES in consideration of enrolling my child there. 8. Was there any conversation that 2023 has proven to be off to a great start with student growth (academic and behavior) already being seen and seemingly improved teacher morale already being shown? My child is one who is currently experiencing some growth academically and I do attribute that to not having a long summer break and getting them back into a classroom environment after a short break and not having a lot of learning loss. 9. Was it considered that many teachers/staff members and families within the community chose WMES BECAUSE of the balanced calendar? 10. Were our demographics given any consideration? With the number of at-risk students represented, their being out of the classroom for 3/5 weeks at a time seems like a much better option for addressing structure insecurity (food, safety, etc.) than for a full summer. Thank you for your consideration of these questions and feedback. WMES has faced and overcome some huge hurdles over the past few years and I am thankful for and proud of how our administration, staff, and teachers have stayed focused and committed to serving the students and families to the best of their ability. It is sometimes frustrating that we allow the test data to paint the picture vs. the stories of success happening within our schools every day that cannot always be reflected on a standardized test. I am proud to be a part of WMES and know that there are so many great things ahead for the school as a whole! The balanced calendar is an asset and truly works for many families. We are one that chose WMES based on both the balanced calendar and dual language option with the balanced calendar being the biggest draw. From my experience, many times when the balanced calendar story is told within the community, it is told with pride and celebrated by others! I do understand that there are families zoned for WMES that choose to not attend there and apply to attend another school. I see our families within the county having options for what best fits their family as a beautiful thing and something to be celebrated. I believe that our having a variety of choice schools truly helps to make CCS shine! Based on how this has all played out, survey feedback, appreciation for choice schools, etc. I do ask that you reconsider your recommendation as I believe that it would truly be a great loss for us as a school and as a county to take a step backward in many ways by eliminating the balanced calendar option! link

As a WMES parent and stakeholder, I would like some clarification regarding the recommendation that the committee landed on regarding the WMES Balanced Calendar. 1. Why was the only communication regarding the survey via ParentSquare? This is a new communication tool that many families and even teachers/staff are still trying to learn. We had 1 message sent out and then a reminder “pinned” to the initial message. The reminder was in response to a conversation during a PTO meeting where parents didn’t know about the survey and weren’t sure how to find it in ParentSquare. It seems that various communication platforms for this important of an initiative would have been used vs. just one brand-new platform which I imagine some families have not yet downloaded/registered or begun to use. For other initiatives, we get phone calls, emails from teachers, social media highlights, flyers sent home, etc. I'd also suggest that an in-person option for this type of desired feedback would have been a welcomed opportunity and would have allowed for actual dialogue with the stakeholders (teachers/staff/families) vs. just an electronic survey. 2. Of the families and staff that completed the survey, the majority of the response was in favor of the balanced calendar. What weight does that have within your final recommendation? 3. Are the results/recommendation and opportunities for feedback going to be communicated in addition to the Teams call so that everyone has access to the information? From what I've seen, no follow-up has been sent out other than the invite/reminder for the one TEAMS call last Thursday (Sept. 21) at 4pm, which was sent via Parent Square - the problem with that platform already acknowledged. From what I could tell, there were 14 people (including leadership and families) on the call. I truly wonder how many parents/families even know this review process is taking place - especially with it only being communicated via ParentSquare! Also, we are being directed to this page (Engage CCS) for communication. However, the WMES review project was not listed on the site at the time of the call and wasn't listed until the following day after the Teams call and the QA component was not available until several days later. Based on the communication that has occurred, unless someone was on the call, they would not know about this page or option for information/feedback. Considering these observations along with how the whole thing has been played out, it does make the process of coming to a recommendation seem somewhat questionable. 4. Was the fact that the timeline for the survey results/recommendation communication falls right within a WMES intercession making it difficult for parents/families and teachers/staff to process and communicate together considered? I can imagine there is no perfect time to roll something like this out, but to be made aware of it on the first day of an intercession did prove to be frustrating. 5. According to the EOG data shared during the online update meeting, the data indicates that there has been some growth and some decline in the various areas tested. 2023 seemingly has the most decline overall. Was there any consideration of the “why” behind those scores? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have EC fully staffed? Was it acknowledged that WMES did not have all grade-level classrooms fully staffed with some of them going weeks/months with a substitute? Was it acknowledged we had a brand new principal? Was it acknowledged that during Quarters 3&4 of the 2021-2022 school year, we lost many teachers and leadership (MTSS, Principal, etc.) with several of those classroom teacher vacancies and the MTSS role not being able to be immediately replaced? 6. What is the comparison of WMES EOG and absence/attendance data vs. the rest of the county with similar demographics? Can it be proven that going to the traditional calendar will ensure growth? From what I've been able to find online, it seems that there are other schools that are on the traditional calendar that are lower than WMES. What is the committee's and/or county's overall goal in placing WMES back on a traditional calendar? Is this recommended change back to traditional simply to make it “easier” for the county overall? With the survey results, big-picture data, and lack of communication and opportunity for dialogue, it seems this recommendation is potentially based on the committee’/county leadership's preference vs. what data and feedback suggest is profitable and desirable for the students/families. 7. Was the growth trend from the years of beginning the balanced calendar up until the pandemic considered? Based on the NC DPI’s grading system, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. This was a trend that as a parent I was excited to see when researching WMES in consideration of enrolling my child there. 8. Was there any conversation that 2023 has proven to be off to a great start with student growth (academic and behavior) already being seen and seemingly improved teacher morale already being shown? My child is one who is currently experiencing some growth academically and I do attribute that to not having a long summer break and getting them back into a classroom environment after a short break and not having a lot of learning loss. 9. Was it considered that many teachers/staff members and families within the community chose WMES BECAUSE of the balanced calendar? 10. Were our demographics given any consideration? With the number of at-risk students represented, their being out of the classroom for 3/5 weeks at a time seems like a much better option for addressing structure insecurity (food, safety, etc.) than for a full summer. Thank you for your consideration of these questions and feedback. WMES has faced and overcome some huge hurdles over the past few years and I am thankful for and proud of how our administration, staff, and teachers have stayed focused and committed to serving the students and families to the best of their ability. It is sometimes frustrating that we allow the test data to paint the picture vs. the stories of success happening within our schools every day that cannot always be reflected on a standardized test. I am proud to be a part of WMES and know that there are so many great things ahead for the school as a whole! The balanced calendar is an asset and truly works for many families. We are one that chose WMES based on both the balanced calendar and dual language option with the balanced calendar being the biggest draw. From my experience, many times when the balanced calendar story is told within the community, it is told with pride and celebrated by others! I do understand that there are families zoned for WMES that choose to not attend there and apply to attend another school. I see our families within the county having options for what best fits their family as a beautiful thing and something to be celebrated. I believe that our having a variety of choice schools truly helps to make CCS shine! Based on how this has all played out, survey feedback, appreciation for choice schools, etc. I do ask that you reconsider your recommendation as I believe that it would truly be a great loss for us as a school and as a county to take a step backward in many ways by eliminating the balanced calendar option!

WMES Parent asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your participation and value your input.
1. Why was the survey for the balanced calendar conducted exclusively via ParentSquare, a new communication tool, rather than using various platforms, including in-person options, to ensure broader participation and understanding? All programs who were a part of the programmatic review process, were asked to send out initial communication and surveys through Parent Square. It was not limited to this being the only mechanism to disseminate information.
2. Given that the majority of families and staff who completed the survey favored the balanced calendar, how much weight does this preference hold in the final recommendation? The recommendation to switch from a Balanced Calendar to a Traditional Calendar, considers several factors including attendance, school performance, test scores, student and staff survey results, and program opt in vs opt out.
3. Will the survey results, recommendation, and opportunities for feedback be communicated beyond the Teams call to ensure broader access to information, especially for those who may not be aware of the review process? An in-person meeting will be scheduled to present the data again to the community.
4. Was the timing of the survey results and recommendation, which coincided with a Wolf Meadow Elementary School intercession period, considered as a factor affecting communication and processing for parents, families, and teachers/staff? The timeline was shared with programs at the end of August. The surveys were conducted August 30th through September 15th prior to intersession. Results were shared with all principals prior to intersession. Due to the Program Choice window and board meetings, the timeline was feasible.
5. Regarding the EOG data, were the reasons behind the scores' fluctuations in various areas acknowledged, such as EC staffing issues, classroom vacancies, and leadership changes? Wolf Meadow has experienced many of the same issues as other schools in the district. We reviewed the data based on the program in its entirety.
6. What is the comparison between WMES EOG and absence/attendance data and other schools with similar demographics on a traditional calendar? Is there evidence that the traditional calendar will guarantee academic growth? Wolf Meadow was compared with similar schools across the district who are on a traditional calendar. Data from other traditional calendar schools suggests a move away from the balanced calendar.
7. Were the positive growth trends observed from the beginning of the balanced calendar until the pandemic, as indicated by the NC DPI grading system, taken into account? School performance, attendance, students asking for hardships based on the calendar, and test data over the last few years were used to help make this decision. Reviews of programs will be conducted every three years.
8. Was there any discussion about the promising start to 2023, with early signs of academic and behavioral growth, as well as improved teacher morale, and how this relates to the balanced calendar? Data was gathered during the first quarter of 2023-24 and was discussed as a part of the programmatic review.
9. Were the reasons why many teachers, staff, and families chose WMES specifically because of the balanced calendar considered in the recommendation? The recommendation to switch from a Balanced Calendar to a Traditional Calendar, considers several factors including attendance, school performance, test scores, student and staff survey results, and program opt in vs opt out.
10. Did the demographic composition of WMES, including the presence of at-risk students, influence the decision, especially in terms of addressing factors like food security and safety through the balanced calendar? As part of the program review, demographics and socio-economic composition was reviewed.
Share As a parent of a current DLI student, I understand the 90-10 model will aid in learning the second language more quickly, however, the students also have to learn English. When will English language learning occur? All students are tested in English so it would make sense that you will see test scores drop if you're not teaching both languages equally. The 90-10 model does not make sense unless the only goal is to learn a second language. Since the goal of elementary education is to have a solid foundation in all subjects areas, this does not seem like a logical program change. It is not a program I would have chosen for my child. on Facebook Share As a parent of a current DLI student, I understand the 90-10 model will aid in learning the second language more quickly, however, the students also have to learn English. When will English language learning occur? All students are tested in English so it would make sense that you will see test scores drop if you're not teaching both languages equally. The 90-10 model does not make sense unless the only goal is to learn a second language. Since the goal of elementary education is to have a solid foundation in all subjects areas, this does not seem like a logical program change. It is not a program I would have chosen for my child. on Twitter Share As a parent of a current DLI student, I understand the 90-10 model will aid in learning the second language more quickly, however, the students also have to learn English. When will English language learning occur? All students are tested in English so it would make sense that you will see test scores drop if you're not teaching both languages equally. The 90-10 model does not make sense unless the only goal is to learn a second language. Since the goal of elementary education is to have a solid foundation in all subjects areas, this does not seem like a logical program change. It is not a program I would have chosen for my child. on Linkedin Email As a parent of a current DLI student, I understand the 90-10 model will aid in learning the second language more quickly, however, the students also have to learn English. When will English language learning occur? All students are tested in English so it would make sense that you will see test scores drop if you're not teaching both languages equally. The 90-10 model does not make sense unless the only goal is to learn a second language. Since the goal of elementary education is to have a solid foundation in all subjects areas, this does not seem like a logical program change. It is not a program I would have chosen for my child. link

As a parent of a current DLI student, I understand the 90-10 model will aid in learning the second language more quickly, however, the students also have to learn English. When will English language learning occur? All students are tested in English so it would make sense that you will see test scores drop if you're not teaching both languages equally. The 90-10 model does not make sense unless the only goal is to learn a second language. Since the goal of elementary education is to have a solid foundation in all subjects areas, this does not seem like a logical program change. It is not a program I would have chosen for my child.

Courtney asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your participation and value your input. When students receive instruction in Spanish Language Arts they are learning skills that transfer to their ability to read English. Phonemic and phonological awareness acquired during Spanish Language Arts instruction transfer to students' ability to read English because Spanish and English use the same alphabet and the letters have the same sounds. Research studies and data from other DLI Spanish programs in North Carolina that use a 90-10 model in the primary grades show that students in DLI programs outperform their non-DLI peers in English Language Arts assessments. Kindergarten would begin with a 90-10 ratio of Spanish to English ,and that percentage would progressively move towards 50-50 from year-to-year as the student moves through the elementary grades with the intent to be at 50-50 by 3rd grade.
Share I am a mother of a current Wolf Meadow student who I withdrew from his 'home' school to go to Wolf Meadow specifically for their balanced calendar. I have a few questions and comments about survey and decision to discontinue the balanced calendar. I believe the balanced calendar is a HUGE asset to our community, the district, and students. In other states and districts it has been proven time and time again that year round school benefits students in multiple ways. Students don't forget what they've learned over the summer, students get a much needed break between semesters to relax and refresh, at risk students stay safer and are fed at a more consistent rate with a balanced calendar. Families below the poverty line and single parent households have an easier time paying for five weeks of summer care then they do 8+. Was any of that taken into consideration? My additional questions are: 1. The survey was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How do you take into account parents that haven't downloaded the app? Parents that haven't learned how to work the app? Teachers that are fully familiar with the app? Why was this the only form of communication? Other important school information is blasted out on the Facebook page, the PTO page, sent home via flyer, sent via email from the teacher. But this EXTREMELY important survey...only on a brand new app. 2. According to the survey only 27 families responded. That's just a little over one class. Doesn't that raise a red flag that everyone may not know about the survey? That maybe it should be sent to families via another method? 3. Response to the survey shows that overwhelmingly families want to continue the balanced calendar. Why does this seem to have NO weight on the county's decision to continue the balanced calendar. 4. Teachers overwhelmingly like the balanced calendar. Multiple teachers decided to teach at Wolf Meadow BECAUSE of the balanced calendar. Does this carry no weight? 5. Was the fact that Wolf Meadow was not fully staffed last year taken into consideration? My child didn't have an EC teacher for most of the year. This year his teacher quit after the first week. Was the teacher shortage discussed as a reason for EOG decline? That would seem to be the largest factor in grades. Children need consistency to thrive and learn. 6. comparing our school's report card with schools with similar demographics Wolf Meadow is performing better than schools with traditional calendar. Was this taken into consideration? 7. Reviewing growth treads on the NC DPI's grading system, up until the pandemic, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. So far in 2023 there is student growth and great overall school morale. Was any of this taken into consideration? 8. The survey and the results TEAMS call falls right at and over fall intercession. That increases the difficulty for communication to families and teachers/staff to communicate with each other and really affects families even knowing the decision. I believe the TEAMS call regarding the survey results had 15 TOTAL participants. Again notification of that meeting was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How many families actually know this decision was made? It feels premature to get rid of the balanced calendar at this time. Most of the families that attend Wolf Meadow didn't respond, potentially from lack of knowledge of the survey. The actual survey responses show that families and teachers alike prefer the balanced calendar. Timing the survey, results, and a voting board meeting during intercession makes the whole process feel fishy, like what the teachers and families want doesn't matter, it's just box checked. Please take more time with this decision. Make sure you have a majority percentage of participation in the survey. Pause and listen to what the people who this decision directly affects say and feel. Taking a way this option would be a great loss for the school, the students, teachers, and the community. on Facebook Share I am a mother of a current Wolf Meadow student who I withdrew from his 'home' school to go to Wolf Meadow specifically for their balanced calendar. I have a few questions and comments about survey and decision to discontinue the balanced calendar. I believe the balanced calendar is a HUGE asset to our community, the district, and students. In other states and districts it has been proven time and time again that year round school benefits students in multiple ways. Students don't forget what they've learned over the summer, students get a much needed break between semesters to relax and refresh, at risk students stay safer and are fed at a more consistent rate with a balanced calendar. Families below the poverty line and single parent households have an easier time paying for five weeks of summer care then they do 8+. Was any of that taken into consideration? My additional questions are: 1. The survey was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How do you take into account parents that haven't downloaded the app? Parents that haven't learned how to work the app? Teachers that are fully familiar with the app? Why was this the only form of communication? Other important school information is blasted out on the Facebook page, the PTO page, sent home via flyer, sent via email from the teacher. But this EXTREMELY important survey...only on a brand new app. 2. According to the survey only 27 families responded. That's just a little over one class. Doesn't that raise a red flag that everyone may not know about the survey? That maybe it should be sent to families via another method? 3. Response to the survey shows that overwhelmingly families want to continue the balanced calendar. Why does this seem to have NO weight on the county's decision to continue the balanced calendar. 4. Teachers overwhelmingly like the balanced calendar. Multiple teachers decided to teach at Wolf Meadow BECAUSE of the balanced calendar. Does this carry no weight? 5. Was the fact that Wolf Meadow was not fully staffed last year taken into consideration? My child didn't have an EC teacher for most of the year. This year his teacher quit after the first week. Was the teacher shortage discussed as a reason for EOG decline? That would seem to be the largest factor in grades. Children need consistency to thrive and learn. 6. comparing our school's report card with schools with similar demographics Wolf Meadow is performing better than schools with traditional calendar. Was this taken into consideration? 7. Reviewing growth treads on the NC DPI's grading system, up until the pandemic, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. So far in 2023 there is student growth and great overall school morale. Was any of this taken into consideration? 8. The survey and the results TEAMS call falls right at and over fall intercession. That increases the difficulty for communication to families and teachers/staff to communicate with each other and really affects families even knowing the decision. I believe the TEAMS call regarding the survey results had 15 TOTAL participants. Again notification of that meeting was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How many families actually know this decision was made? It feels premature to get rid of the balanced calendar at this time. Most of the families that attend Wolf Meadow didn't respond, potentially from lack of knowledge of the survey. The actual survey responses show that families and teachers alike prefer the balanced calendar. Timing the survey, results, and a voting board meeting during intercession makes the whole process feel fishy, like what the teachers and families want doesn't matter, it's just box checked. Please take more time with this decision. Make sure you have a majority percentage of participation in the survey. Pause and listen to what the people who this decision directly affects say and feel. Taking a way this option would be a great loss for the school, the students, teachers, and the community. on Twitter Share I am a mother of a current Wolf Meadow student who I withdrew from his 'home' school to go to Wolf Meadow specifically for their balanced calendar. I have a few questions and comments about survey and decision to discontinue the balanced calendar. I believe the balanced calendar is a HUGE asset to our community, the district, and students. In other states and districts it has been proven time and time again that year round school benefits students in multiple ways. Students don't forget what they've learned over the summer, students get a much needed break between semesters to relax and refresh, at risk students stay safer and are fed at a more consistent rate with a balanced calendar. Families below the poverty line and single parent households have an easier time paying for five weeks of summer care then they do 8+. Was any of that taken into consideration? My additional questions are: 1. The survey was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How do you take into account parents that haven't downloaded the app? Parents that haven't learned how to work the app? Teachers that are fully familiar with the app? Why was this the only form of communication? Other important school information is blasted out on the Facebook page, the PTO page, sent home via flyer, sent via email from the teacher. But this EXTREMELY important survey...only on a brand new app. 2. According to the survey only 27 families responded. That's just a little over one class. Doesn't that raise a red flag that everyone may not know about the survey? That maybe it should be sent to families via another method? 3. Response to the survey shows that overwhelmingly families want to continue the balanced calendar. Why does this seem to have NO weight on the county's decision to continue the balanced calendar. 4. Teachers overwhelmingly like the balanced calendar. Multiple teachers decided to teach at Wolf Meadow BECAUSE of the balanced calendar. Does this carry no weight? 5. Was the fact that Wolf Meadow was not fully staffed last year taken into consideration? My child didn't have an EC teacher for most of the year. This year his teacher quit after the first week. Was the teacher shortage discussed as a reason for EOG decline? That would seem to be the largest factor in grades. Children need consistency to thrive and learn. 6. comparing our school's report card with schools with similar demographics Wolf Meadow is performing better than schools with traditional calendar. Was this taken into consideration? 7. Reviewing growth treads on the NC DPI's grading system, up until the pandemic, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. So far in 2023 there is student growth and great overall school morale. Was any of this taken into consideration? 8. The survey and the results TEAMS call falls right at and over fall intercession. That increases the difficulty for communication to families and teachers/staff to communicate with each other and really affects families even knowing the decision. I believe the TEAMS call regarding the survey results had 15 TOTAL participants. Again notification of that meeting was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How many families actually know this decision was made? It feels premature to get rid of the balanced calendar at this time. Most of the families that attend Wolf Meadow didn't respond, potentially from lack of knowledge of the survey. The actual survey responses show that families and teachers alike prefer the balanced calendar. Timing the survey, results, and a voting board meeting during intercession makes the whole process feel fishy, like what the teachers and families want doesn't matter, it's just box checked. Please take more time with this decision. Make sure you have a majority percentage of participation in the survey. Pause and listen to what the people who this decision directly affects say and feel. Taking a way this option would be a great loss for the school, the students, teachers, and the community. on Linkedin Email I am a mother of a current Wolf Meadow student who I withdrew from his 'home' school to go to Wolf Meadow specifically for their balanced calendar. I have a few questions and comments about survey and decision to discontinue the balanced calendar. I believe the balanced calendar is a HUGE asset to our community, the district, and students. In other states and districts it has been proven time and time again that year round school benefits students in multiple ways. Students don't forget what they've learned over the summer, students get a much needed break between semesters to relax and refresh, at risk students stay safer and are fed at a more consistent rate with a balanced calendar. Families below the poverty line and single parent households have an easier time paying for five weeks of summer care then they do 8+. Was any of that taken into consideration? My additional questions are: 1. The survey was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How do you take into account parents that haven't downloaded the app? Parents that haven't learned how to work the app? Teachers that are fully familiar with the app? Why was this the only form of communication? Other important school information is blasted out on the Facebook page, the PTO page, sent home via flyer, sent via email from the teacher. But this EXTREMELY important survey...only on a brand new app. 2. According to the survey only 27 families responded. That's just a little over one class. Doesn't that raise a red flag that everyone may not know about the survey? That maybe it should be sent to families via another method? 3. Response to the survey shows that overwhelmingly families want to continue the balanced calendar. Why does this seem to have NO weight on the county's decision to continue the balanced calendar. 4. Teachers overwhelmingly like the balanced calendar. Multiple teachers decided to teach at Wolf Meadow BECAUSE of the balanced calendar. Does this carry no weight? 5. Was the fact that Wolf Meadow was not fully staffed last year taken into consideration? My child didn't have an EC teacher for most of the year. This year his teacher quit after the first week. Was the teacher shortage discussed as a reason for EOG decline? That would seem to be the largest factor in grades. Children need consistency to thrive and learn. 6. comparing our school's report card with schools with similar demographics Wolf Meadow is performing better than schools with traditional calendar. Was this taken into consideration? 7. Reviewing growth treads on the NC DPI's grading system, up until the pandemic, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. So far in 2023 there is student growth and great overall school morale. Was any of this taken into consideration? 8. The survey and the results TEAMS call falls right at and over fall intercession. That increases the difficulty for communication to families and teachers/staff to communicate with each other and really affects families even knowing the decision. I believe the TEAMS call regarding the survey results had 15 TOTAL participants. Again notification of that meeting was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How many families actually know this decision was made? It feels premature to get rid of the balanced calendar at this time. Most of the families that attend Wolf Meadow didn't respond, potentially from lack of knowledge of the survey. The actual survey responses show that families and teachers alike prefer the balanced calendar. Timing the survey, results, and a voting board meeting during intercession makes the whole process feel fishy, like what the teachers and families want doesn't matter, it's just box checked. Please take more time with this decision. Make sure you have a majority percentage of participation in the survey. Pause and listen to what the people who this decision directly affects say and feel. Taking a way this option would be a great loss for the school, the students, teachers, and the community. link

I am a mother of a current Wolf Meadow student who I withdrew from his 'home' school to go to Wolf Meadow specifically for their balanced calendar. I have a few questions and comments about survey and decision to discontinue the balanced calendar. I believe the balanced calendar is a HUGE asset to our community, the district, and students. In other states and districts it has been proven time and time again that year round school benefits students in multiple ways. Students don't forget what they've learned over the summer, students get a much needed break between semesters to relax and refresh, at risk students stay safer and are fed at a more consistent rate with a balanced calendar. Families below the poverty line and single parent households have an easier time paying for five weeks of summer care then they do 8+. Was any of that taken into consideration? My additional questions are: 1. The survey was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How do you take into account parents that haven't downloaded the app? Parents that haven't learned how to work the app? Teachers that are fully familiar with the app? Why was this the only form of communication? Other important school information is blasted out on the Facebook page, the PTO page, sent home via flyer, sent via email from the teacher. But this EXTREMELY important survey...only on a brand new app. 2. According to the survey only 27 families responded. That's just a little over one class. Doesn't that raise a red flag that everyone may not know about the survey? That maybe it should be sent to families via another method? 3. Response to the survey shows that overwhelmingly families want to continue the balanced calendar. Why does this seem to have NO weight on the county's decision to continue the balanced calendar. 4. Teachers overwhelmingly like the balanced calendar. Multiple teachers decided to teach at Wolf Meadow BECAUSE of the balanced calendar. Does this carry no weight? 5. Was the fact that Wolf Meadow was not fully staffed last year taken into consideration? My child didn't have an EC teacher for most of the year. This year his teacher quit after the first week. Was the teacher shortage discussed as a reason for EOG decline? That would seem to be the largest factor in grades. Children need consistency to thrive and learn. 6. comparing our school's report card with schools with similar demographics Wolf Meadow is performing better than schools with traditional calendar. Was this taken into consideration? 7. Reviewing growth treads on the NC DPI's grading system, up until the pandemic, the balanced calendar was proving to be successful. So far in 2023 there is student growth and great overall school morale. Was any of this taken into consideration? 8. The survey and the results TEAMS call falls right at and over fall intercession. That increases the difficulty for communication to families and teachers/staff to communicate with each other and really affects families even knowing the decision. I believe the TEAMS call regarding the survey results had 15 TOTAL participants. Again notification of that meeting was sent out ONLY via ParentSquare. How many families actually know this decision was made? It feels premature to get rid of the balanced calendar at this time. Most of the families that attend Wolf Meadow didn't respond, potentially from lack of knowledge of the survey. The actual survey responses show that families and teachers alike prefer the balanced calendar. Timing the survey, results, and a voting board meeting during intercession makes the whole process feel fishy, like what the teachers and families want doesn't matter, it's just box checked. Please take more time with this decision. Make sure you have a majority percentage of participation in the survey. Pause and listen to what the people who this decision directly affects say and feel. Taking a way this option would be a great loss for the school, the students, teachers, and the community.

aheff0421 asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your questions. We appreciate your input.
1. How was the fact that the balanced calendar benefits students, particularly in terms of retention of knowledge, breaks between semesters, and support for at-risk students, taken into consideration? We used data from school performance (proficiency and growth), test data, absentee reports, opt out data, parent, and staff data to help drive the recommendation.
2. Why was the survey for this important decision sent out exclusively through the ParentSquare app, and how were parents who hadn't downloaded the app or were unfamiliar with it accounted for? All programs who were a part of the programmatic review process, were asked to send out initial communication and surveys through Parent Square. It was not limited to this being the only mechanism to get the word out.
3. With only 27 families responding to the survey, which is slightly over one class, doesn't this suggest that not everyone was aware of it? Shouldn't other methods of communication have been used? The survey was sent to every parent in ParentSquare and current data shows 546 of 556 students’ parent or guardian received the survey. The survey was created in both English and Spanish.
4. Despite an overwhelming preference among families to continue the balanced calendar, why does it seem that this sentiment carries no weight in the county's decision-making process? We used data from school performance (proficiency and growth), test data, absentee reports, opt out data, parent, and staff survey results to help drive the recommendation.
5. How much importance is given to the fact that teachers at Wolf Meadow overwhelmingly favor the balanced calendar, with some choosing to teach there specifically because of it? Was the teacher shortage discussed as a potential reason for declines in EOG scores? Wolf Meadow has experienced teacher shortages like other schools in the district, the shortage was not discussed as a reason for a decline in EOG scores specifically for 3rd – 5th grade.
6. Was the performance of Wolf Meadow compared to schools with similar demographics on report cards taken into account when considering the future of the balanced calendar? School performance for Wolf Meadow was compared districtwide across CCS, including schools with similar student populations.
7. Were the positive growth trends observed in the NC DPI's grading system prior to the pandemic, as well as the current student growth and school morale in 2023, considered in the decision-making process? We used data from school performance (proficiency and growth), test data, absentee reports, opt out data, parent, and staff data to help drive the recommendation.
8. Considering that the survey and results discussion occurred during the fall intercession, with limited participants, how confident are we that the decision reflects the sentiments of the majority of families and teachers at Wolf Meadow? The timeline was shared with programs at the end of August. The surveys were conducted August 30th through September 15th prior to intersession. Results were shared with all principals prior to intersession. Due to the Program Choice window and board meetings, the timeline was feasible.
9. Is it possible to take more time with this decision, ensure a higher percentage of participation in the survey, and truly listen to the opinions and concerns of those directly affected by this decision, including teachers, families, and the community? An in-person meeting will be scheduled to present the data again to the community.
10. How is the potential loss of the balanced calendar option being weighed against its benefits for the school, students, teachers, and the community? A support system has been put into place to help with issues as they arise in terms of Human Resources, Curriculum & Instruction, Student Services, etc…
Share I have a concern about overcrowding at Wolf Meadow should the decision be made to discontinue the balanced calendar. Students who have opted out of Wolf Meadow will now be coming back and our already at capacity classrooms will be overfilled. How will this be addressed? on Facebook Share I have a concern about overcrowding at Wolf Meadow should the decision be made to discontinue the balanced calendar. Students who have opted out of Wolf Meadow will now be coming back and our already at capacity classrooms will be overfilled. How will this be addressed? on Twitter Share I have a concern about overcrowding at Wolf Meadow should the decision be made to discontinue the balanced calendar. Students who have opted out of Wolf Meadow will now be coming back and our already at capacity classrooms will be overfilled. How will this be addressed? on Linkedin Email I have a concern about overcrowding at Wolf Meadow should the decision be made to discontinue the balanced calendar. Students who have opted out of Wolf Meadow will now be coming back and our already at capacity classrooms will be overfilled. How will this be addressed? link

I have a concern about overcrowding at Wolf Meadow should the decision be made to discontinue the balanced calendar. Students who have opted out of Wolf Meadow will now be coming back and our already at capacity classrooms will be overfilled. How will this be addressed?

aheff0421 asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your input. Although we are full at many elementary schools across the district as this has been our largest growth over the years, Wolf Meadow Elementary School is one of the few where we have available space. Students who have opted out of balance calendar have put capacity pressures on adjacent schools.
Share Where can parents find year over year data on attendance and test scores being used to make a decision about balanced calendar at Wolf Meadow? on Facebook Share Where can parents find year over year data on attendance and test scores being used to make a decision about balanced calendar at Wolf Meadow? on Twitter Share Where can parents find year over year data on attendance and test scores being used to make a decision about balanced calendar at Wolf Meadow? on Linkedin Email Where can parents find year over year data on attendance and test scores being used to make a decision about balanced calendar at Wolf Meadow? link

Where can parents find year over year data on attendance and test scores being used to make a decision about balanced calendar at Wolf Meadow?

Shana Filkins asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We greatly appreciate your input. Academic and Attendance data for the 2021-2022 school year for all Cabarrus County Schools can be found on the NC Report Card available at this link: https://ncreports.ondemand.sas.com/src/index(External link).
Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, How is it that no other schools (middle and high school within Wolf Meadow Elementary school district) participated to help demonstrate the benefits of Balanced Calendar, especially for families that have multiple children in different school levels. on Facebook Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, How is it that no other schools (middle and high school within Wolf Meadow Elementary school district) participated to help demonstrate the benefits of Balanced Calendar, especially for families that have multiple children in different school levels. on Twitter Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, How is it that no other schools (middle and high school within Wolf Meadow Elementary school district) participated to help demonstrate the benefits of Balanced Calendar, especially for families that have multiple children in different school levels. on Linkedin Email Regarding Balanced Calendar, How is it that no other schools (middle and high school within Wolf Meadow Elementary school district) participated to help demonstrate the benefits of Balanced Calendar, especially for families that have multiple children in different school levels. link

Regarding Balanced Calendar, How is it that no other schools (middle and high school within Wolf Meadow Elementary school district) participated to help demonstrate the benefits of Balanced Calendar, especially for families that have multiple children in different school levels.

DCarpenter asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your input. We do not ask for input from other schools and staff that are not directly impacted in the programmatic review. If parents have students that attend multiple schools, they can answer the questions through that lens.
Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, how is it that when the majority of those that took the survey stated that they are satisfied with the Balanced Calendar that the recommendation is to move back to Traditional Calendar? on Facebook Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, how is it that when the majority of those that took the survey stated that they are satisfied with the Balanced Calendar that the recommendation is to move back to Traditional Calendar? on Twitter Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, how is it that when the majority of those that took the survey stated that they are satisfied with the Balanced Calendar that the recommendation is to move back to Traditional Calendar? on Linkedin Email Regarding Balanced Calendar, how is it that when the majority of those that took the survey stated that they are satisfied with the Balanced Calendar that the recommendation is to move back to Traditional Calendar? link

Regarding Balanced Calendar, how is it that when the majority of those that took the survey stated that they are satisfied with the Balanced Calendar that the recommendation is to move back to Traditional Calendar?

DCarpenter asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your input. Parent and staff surveys were taken into consideration as a part of the process. School Performance, Attendance, Test Data, and other factors were also considered.
Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, were factors such as the pandemic, large turnover, and certain positions not being fully/quickly filled, taken into consideration as to why the school's performance was low the past couple of years? on Facebook Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, were factors such as the pandemic, large turnover, and certain positions not being fully/quickly filled, taken into consideration as to why the school's performance was low the past couple of years? on Twitter Share Regarding Balanced Calendar, were factors such as the pandemic, large turnover, and certain positions not being fully/quickly filled, taken into consideration as to why the school's performance was low the past couple of years? on Linkedin Email Regarding Balanced Calendar, were factors such as the pandemic, large turnover, and certain positions not being fully/quickly filled, taken into consideration as to why the school's performance was low the past couple of years? link

Regarding Balanced Calendar, were factors such as the pandemic, large turnover, and certain positions not being fully/quickly filled, taken into consideration as to why the school's performance was low the past couple of years?

DCarpenter asked 7 months ago

Thank you for your question. We appreciate your input. The factors you have mentioned were considered because they have had an impact, in one way or another, on the performance of many of our schools over the last three years. Recognizing the widespread influence of the pandemic, the challenges associated with high turnover rates, and the difficulties in filling certain positions is crucial for understanding the broader context within which our schools have been operating and addressing performance issues effectively.

Page last updated: 09 Oct 2023, 04:50 AM

2023-24 Programmatic Review

Questions

Can parents get a copy of the presentation that was shown on 9.21 detailing the reasons to end the balanced calendar?

I have a concern about overcrowding at Wolf Meadow should the decision be made to discontinue the balanced calendar. Students who have opted out of Wolf Meadow will now be coming back and our already at capacity classrooms will be overfilled. How will this be addressed?

Where can parents find year over year data on attendance and test scores being used to make a decision about balanced calendar at Wolf Meadow?

Regarding Balanced Calendar, How is it that no other schools (middle and high school within Wolf Meadow Elementary school district) participated to help demonstrate the benefits of Balanced Calendar, especially for families that have multiple children in different school levels.

Regarding Balanced Calendar, how is it that when the majority of those that took the survey stated that they are satisfied with the Balanced Calendar that the recommendation is to move back to Traditional Calendar?

Regarding Balanced Calendar, were factors such as the pandemic, large turnover, and certain positions not being fully/quickly filled, taken into consideration as to why the school's performance was low the past couple of years?

Who's Listening

FAQs

Key Dates

Documents